Understanding Moore County's Debt and Its Impact
- Robert Bortins
- 4 hours ago
- 5 min read
Moore County, like many local governments, faces the challenge of managing its debt effectively. Understanding the intricacies of this debt and its implications for residents is crucial for informed civic engagement. This blog post delves into the current state of Moore County's debt, its causes, and its potential impact on the community.
Understanding Moore County's Municipal Debt
Municipal debt refers to money borrowed by local governments to fund various projects and services, including infrastructure improvements, public safety facilities, education, and more. Municipalities typically issue bonds to raise these funds, which are then paid back over time with interest—and ultimately, with taxpayer dollars.
Types of Municipal Debt
General Obligation Bonds: These are backed by the full faith and credit of the issuing municipality, including its taxing power. They require voter approval and are typically used for projects that benefit the public, such as schools and parks. These bonds generally receive the most favorable interest rates because they're backed by the government's ability to raise taxes to repay them.
Limited Obligation Bonds: These can be issued without voter approval and are secured by specific revenue sources rather than the full taxing power of the government. Moore County used this method to finance the $32.1 million Rick Rhyne Public Safety Center and jail.
Revenue Bonds: These are secured by specific revenue sources, such as utility fees or tolls. They are often used for projects that generate income, like water and sewer systems.
Short-term Debt: This includes notes and loans expected to be paid back within a year, often used to cover temporary cash flow issues.
Understanding these types of debt is essential for grasping how Moore County manages its financial obligations and how additional debt from a school bond would impact taxpayers.
Current State of Moore County's Debt
Moore County maintains an AA+ bond rating from Standard & Poor's on general obligation debt and an AA rating on limited obligation bonds, reflecting strong fiscal management. However, even with solid ratings, the county carries significant debt obligations.
As of recent financial reports, Moore County's outstanding bonded debt includes obligations from previous school bonds and infrastructure projects. The State of North Carolina limits general obligation debt to 8% of total assessed property value—Moore County's legal debt margin is approximately $868.7 million, meaning the county has substantial borrowing capacity under state law.
Factors Contributing to Current Debt Levels
Several factors contribute to Moore County's existing debt:
Previous Bond Approvals: In 2018, voters approved a $103 million school bond for three elementary schools and a $20 million bond for Sandhills Community College facilities. These bonds are still being repaid.
Infrastructure Needs: The county has invested in public safety facilities, water and sewer systems, and other essential infrastructure, requiring significant borrowing.
Growing Debt Service: County commissioners recently noted their goal to improve the county's bond rating from AA to AAA, acknowledging the current debt burden while emphasizing fiscal responsibility.
Economic Conditions: While Moore County's economy remains relatively strong with tourism, healthcare, and retirement sectors, maintaining services during economic fluctuations sometimes requires additional borrowing.
Debt Trends and the Proposed Bond
Moore County commissioners are now proposing over $100 million in new general obligation bonds for November 2026, including:
A new elementary school in Carthage ($40+ million)
A new high school ($80+ million)
Renovations to Union Pines and Pinecrest High Schools
This would represent a massive increase in the county's debt burden at a time when public school enrollment trends are flat or declining.
Impact of Debt on Residents
The implications of Moore County's debt—and potentially much more debt from the proposed bond—are felt by residents in several ways:
Tax Implications
The most direct impact of municipal debt is on property taxes. As the county borrows more, it must raise taxes to cover principal repayment and interest payments. With the proposed $100+ million bond:
Increased Property Taxes: Homeowners will see property taxes rise to fund debt repayment over 20-30 years. Every dollar borrowed today creates 20-30 years of future tax obligations.
Long-term Burden: Bond debt is typically repaid over 20-30 years, meaning today's borrowing decisions affect taxpayers for decades. Young families buying homes today will be paying for these schools until they're ready to retire—regardless of whether they ever use them.
Reduced Services: If tax revenues prove insufficient or if the county hits debt service limits, Moore County may need to cut other services or delay important projects to maintain bond payments.
Opportunity Cost
Every dollar committed to school bond debt service is a dollar unavailable for other community priorities:
Road improvements and infrastructure maintenance
Public safety equipment and personnel
Emergency services expansion
Economic development initiatives
Parks and recreational facilities
With commissioners already discussing courthouse renovations, emergency services improvements, and downtown redevelopment, a $100+ million school bond would consume resources needed for competing priorities.
Economic Development Impact
High debt levels can affect economic development. Businesses and investors examine a municipality's debt when deciding where to locate. While Moore County's current AA+/AA ratings are solid, significantly increasing debt while enrollment stagnates sends mixed signals about fiscal prudence and growth prospects.
Risk of Overcapacity
Perhaps the most troubling aspect of taking on $100+ million in new debt is the enrollment trend risk. Moore County Schools has lost 12% market share over seven years. With charter school enrollment growing 6.1% annually, private school enrollment up 3.4%, homeschooling increasing 5.5%, and over 80,000 students now receiving Opportunity Scholarships statewide, the risk is real: Moore County could be making 20-30 year debt commitments for facilities that never reach projected capacity.
Building schools for enrollment that doesn't materialize leaves taxpayers servicing debt on half-empty buildings—the fiscal equivalent of buying a large house right before your children move out.
Strategies for Managing Debt Responsibly
Before committing to over $100 million in new debt, Moore County should employ prudent debt management strategies:
Prioritize Projects Based on Actual Need
Rather than building new schools based on optimistic projections, the county should:
Address specific overcrowding with targeted, cost-effective solutions
Optimize existing facilities through redistricting
Monitor enrollment trends for 2-3 more years before making massive commitments
Explore Alternative Funding Sources
Moore County should explore alternatives to large bond issues:
State school construction grants
Public-private partnerships
Phased construction approaches
Repurposing or expanding existing facilities
Regular Financial Assessment
Conducting regular financial assessments helps identify whether large capital expenditures align with actual growth patterns and community needs rather than wishful thinking.
Community Engagement and Transparency
Public Forums and Clear Information
Residents deserve transparent information about:
Total cost including interest (likely $150+ million for a $100 million bond)
Annual tax impact per $100,000 of home value
Enrollment projections vs. actual trends
Alternative solutions considered
Risk analysis if enrollment continues declining
The Question Voters Must Ask
Before voting on this bond, Moore County residents should ask: Are we building for the students who will actually be there, or are we building for yesterday's enrollment patterns?
Conclusion
Understanding Moore County's debt is vital for residents who want to engage effectively with local government finances. The proposed $100+ million school bond represents a massive long-term commitment that would significantly increase the county's debt burden precisely when enrollment trends suggest declining demand for traditional public school facilities.
With charter schools expanding, private school enrollment growing, homeschooling surging, and the Opportunity Scholarship Program making private education accessible to all families, Moore County faces a fundamentally changed educational landscape. Borrowing over $100 million to build traditional public school facilities in this environment isn't prudent stewardship—it's a gamble with taxpayer money that could leave residents paying for decades on underutilized buildings.
Fiscal responsibility requires acknowledging reality: when 28% of school-aged children already choose alternatives to traditional public schools, and state policies increasingly support that choice, building expensive new public school facilities may not serve the community's actual needs.
Moore County residents should demand clear answers about enrollment projections, alternative solutions, and the long-term tax implications before approving this bond. Staying informed and involved will empower residents to make a difference in shaping the county's financial future—and to vote no on a school bond that doesn't align with today's educational reality.
Comments